Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003105, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: revisiting the White Stripes
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:43:11 -0600

[Part 1 text/plain (2.5 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

I get tired of hearing about how the success of The White Stripes or The 
Strokes was due to "the hype".  Hey, it can't be denied that at some point 
in time, a wavie of hype rose for both of them, and they rode it.

However, to say that The White Stripes are solely a hype is absolutely 
false.  The band recorded three albums for small indies and then toured very 
hard on them.  They also wisely focused their touring on regions, building 
substantial following in some areas of the world.  I didn't hear about them 
until about the time their third album came out (pre-major) and it was due 
to the insane number of Chicagoans who had caught one of their numerous live 
appearances in the area.  Dammit, The White Stripes should be an example of 
how a band can make it, not castigated for hype.

The Strokes did not have as long a road to hoe, certainly and paid less 
dues.  Nevertheless, they built their reputation by touring.  Before they 
had one single out, they had already earned raves for a show opening for The 
Doves and not long after, built more fans opening for Guided By Voices.

My point is, the hype came after some hard work, and the type of work that a 
band generally has to do to make it.

Mike Bennett



Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com





>From: "AssociationWorks" <AssociationWorks@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: <audities@smoe.org>
>Subject: Re: revisiting the White Stripes
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:47:51 -0800
>
>Dan:
>I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I still say no one would give half
>a shit about the Strokes or White Stripes if it weren't for the intangible
>"hype" factor that has elevated these overrated indier-than-thou snots
>to Rock God status. I guess the ticket to success in mainstream rock
>is to get the hype, learn to suck, and make a whole=heartedly mediocre
>lo-fi record.
>
>Hats off to Jack and Meg....
>
>Jeff
>
> >>Just to add a YMMV comment... I don't think all of the above (excepting
> >>QOTSA, who did in fact make a huge critical and commercial splash) hold 
>a
> >>candle to the White Stripes or even the Strokes, two bands who actually
>*do* >>write good
> >>songs and actually *do* manipulate their images in their own favor.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in 
enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


Message Index for 2003105, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help