Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003105, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From ronald and karen sanchez <eldeluxe@mcn.net>
Subject Re: revisiting the White Stripes
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:28:31 -0800

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


I gotta agree. I bought cds by both, and they have never got a second play.
Give me Frankie Lee Sims or the Small Faces anyday. who sez I only like old
bands.

RS
AssociationWorks wrote:

> Dan:
> I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I still say no one would give half
> a shit about the Strokes or White Stripes if it weren't for the intangible
> "hype" factor that has elevated these overrated indier-than-thou snots
> to Rock God status. I guess the ticket to success in mainstream rock
> is to get the hype, learn to suck, and make a whole=heartedly mediocre
> lo-fi record.
>
> Hats off to Jack and Meg....
>
> Jeff
>
> >>Just to add a YMMV comment... I don't think all of the above (excepting
> >>QOTSA, who did in fact make a huge critical and commercial splash) hold a
> >>candle to the White Stripes or even the Strokes, two bands who actually
> *do* >>write good
> >>songs and actually *do* manipulate their images in their own favor.

-- Ronald Sanchez
Director Of A&R
Career Records
 www.CareerRecords.com

The Donovan's Brain Web Site
 www.Donovans-Brain.com



Message Index for 2003105, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help