smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Ryan Williams <ryan@headphonetreats.com> |
| Subject | Re: Pro Tools (for dumb fools) |
| Date | Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:00:43 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.5 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
> a far cry when you could tell by using your
> educated ears that a record was recorded in Gold Star, Western/United,
> Capitol, Chess
> Studio, Bradley's Barn, RCA Nashville or Abbey Road in the 60's.
This doesn't have as much to do with the advent of digital recording as
it does the introduction of outboard effects boxes, the tendency
towards heavy isolation between mics, and tons of overdubbing and
re-tracking of parts brought on by 24-track tape. Back then, those
studios' recordings could be picked out of a lineup because they all
used custom built gear (often built in house) and were extremely
limited in outboard effects processing. So, they would pipe thing into
their own custom echo chambers (usually big tiled rooms under the
studios) and use the natural ambience in their huge tracking rooms.
Plus, usually they were limited to a handful of mic inputs and had
limited ability to overdub. You got it right in the recording or you
didn't get it. There was a lot of bleed in the mics, which added to the
ambience. You also had a very strict concept of recording setup from
studio to studio. The engineers usually had one accepted way they were
allowed to place the musicians and mics... no experimentation allowed.
Thanks to engineers like Geoff Emerick, who constantly pushed the
envelop away from those white lab-coat days, recording became much more
experimental and the continuous search for new sounds began.
Ryan
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.