Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003102, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Andrea Kremer <kremer@shore.net>
Subject Re: Emusic: no more unlimited downloads
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:38:49 -0400 (EDT)

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (0.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Stewart Mason wrote:

> depressing.  Honestly, people: $15 a month for 65 songs, or four to five
> albums (more, if a lot of what you're downloading is those Atavistic
> free-improv things that have two 20-minute songs, like me)?  Bargain,
> people, bargain.

I disagree, and here's why:

Sure, eMusic has a decent selection that's probably better than those of
its competitors. But often I can't find what I *really* want there. So
I've been using eMusic to sample a lot of music I wouldn't necessarily
spend money on. If I see a band mentioned on a list or in a magazine, and
it's on eMusic, I download it and check it out. If I don't like it, I
dump it, and no harm no foul because it's' *unlimited*. I've downloaded
some gems, but also a lot of crap.

But if I'm limited to four or five albums a month for $15, frankly, their
selection isn't good enough anymore.

A


Message Index for 2003102, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help