Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003093, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Jocelyn Geboy <smussyolay@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: 4/4 or Fight (was Re: What makes a great song? Poll!?!!)
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:51:12 -0700 (PDT)

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (2.6 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

~~~bravo, kind sir. bravo.
jocelyn
--- David Bash <bashpop@earthlink.net> wrote:
> --- In audities@yahoogroups.com, Lord Granger
> <glowfriend2003@y...> wrote:
> 
> > So why is there a persistent, core group of
> > individuals here intent on squelching any kind of
> > meaningful discourse? Why are so many here
> offended by
> > pushy, individualistic, sometimes
> arrogant-appearing
> > posters (ie. me, Eb, Geir, and JR Taylor)? Why is
> > there so much of this?
> 
> Auditeers are absolutely not intent on squelching
> any kind of meaningful
> discourse on music, but we are a group of
> considerate people who do not
> cotton to being mocked or condesended.  If people
> like you would (or would
> have, in Eb's case) simply, courteously state your
> views without coming off
> as glib, arrogant, or sarcastic, I'm sure we could
> have a very healthy,
> enriching exchange of ideas, even if those ideas you
> presented were totally
> contrary to what you perceive as the pervading
> "groupthink".
> 
> > Craig, I did a little research as you recommended,
> and, yes, I most
> definitely perceive a pattern here.
> 
> The pattern is that most of the newcomers with
> dissenting ideas also seem to
> have the persistent habit of discoursing on them
> with the kind of tone that
> I described in the last paragraph.  For example,
> when Arthur Bang innocently
> asked how he could protect himself from someone who
> might try to steal his
> song ideas, your response made him appear to be a
> dimwitted, naive peon who
> needs to get a life.  Had you merely stated that an
> unknown songwriter need
> not be concerned with these issues because the
> likelihood that a potential
> thief would even his music is very small, rather
> than call him a "pustule"
> and reduce his songwriting to something less than
> insignificance on the
> value scale, it would have gotten the point across
> just as effectively, but
> without the perceived ill will.
> 
> I've noticed that so many people who fancy
> themselves as dissenters and
> revel in stirring up the calm waters tend to also
> equate being nice with
> being weak, and find courtesy and cordiality akin to
> having leprosy.  I
> guarantee you that if you wrap your contrary views
> in a cloak of kindness
> and respect, nobody's nose will be bent out of
> joint.  If you find this
> notion to be repulsive then your revelation that
> you've come to regret being
> a member of this list is probably well-founded.
> 
> David
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

Message Index for 2003093, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help