Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003092, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Ryan Williams <ryan@headphonetreats.com>
Subject Re: No need to register copyrights.
Date Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:07:46 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (2.4 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

> Sometimes, snatches of more famous tunes can be culled from an artist's
> writing, but I would consider that more homage than theft.

Agreed. But again. It's not about theft. Infringement is a big grey 
area. My point was that it rarely comes down to a black and white right 
or wrong. Even in the seemingly black and white cases with groups like 
2LiveCrew, where parody use was the defense, there was a great deal of 
grey area... their was no question of their use of the song.

> Legality? Lawyers will jump on ANYTHING they think will allow them to 
> trade
> up on the Mercedes or boat, and are usually at the center of anything
> creative that ends up in court. The problem with ALL laws is that they 
> are
> often on the side of those that use them to profit from others.
> They're called Courts Of Law...not Courts Of Justice.

While that may sometimes be the case, it is the publishing companies 
that cries foul... you don't have many lawyers listening intently to the 
airwaves trying to dig up a case. And after all, it is the publishers 
property. They should be allowed to protect it if they feel the 
infringement is valid. And as I have pointed out, Infringement is 
terribly difficult to prove. There are few cases that make it past the 
law office, let alone the hearing stage. This isn't an area of law ripe 
in menace suits. Playing it off with the "dirty lawyer" argument doesn't 
really hold water.

A cheesy, yet good example of a valid infringement case was between Huey 
Lewis and the News and Ray Parker Jr. over the theme to "Ghostbusters". 
Huey Lewis had be asked to record a theme for the movie, but he refused 
to be involved. So the producers went to Ray Parker, Jr. and asked him 
to write a song that sounded like something Huey Lewis would do. He did 
so, and in the process infringed on Huey's "I Want A New Drug". The case 
was settled out of court. Heuy was quoted as saying "The offensive part 
was not so much that Ray Parker Jr. had ripped this song off, it was 
kind of symbolic of an industry that wants something -- they wanted our 
wave, and they wanted to buy it. ... [I]t's not for sale. ... In the 
end, I suppose they were right. I suppose it was for sale, because, 
basically, they bought it."

So there's an example of the artist trying to protect himself against 
the industry using this very law. There are countless others.

Ryan


Message Index for 2003092, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help