Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003092, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From JIMMYPRELL@aol.com
Subject Copyright
Date Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:53:07 EDT

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (0.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


In a message dated 9/8/03 9:01:34 AM, audities-owner@smoe.org writes:

<< May sound logical, but it doesn't hold up in a court of law. Here's why:

Take any tune by one of this week's latest music stars. Drop it onto a 
cassette or CDR. Put in an envelope and mail it to yourself.

Now, try and sue the band/artist that released it because you have a sealed 
document "copyrighted". >>

Disagree. The situation you describe is not analagous. 

It's about having the earliest dated sample of the song. The band that 
actually creates the song would have earlier proof, if they bothered to take similar 
precautions. But more to the point, if it's YOUR SONG, then nobody is going 
to have an earlier date, so you'd be protected. 

I'm addressing the guy who wrote a song and wants to protect it; not somebody 
who is looking to rip off somebody else -- the mail wouldn't work for that.

JP


Message Index for 2003092, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help