smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | "Billy G. Spradlin" <bgspradlin@cablelynx.com> |
Subject | Re: Rasbperries |
Date | Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:41:01 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (2.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Some of the Rasberries Best-Of were sold through record clubs, and a white
sleeve promo copy was sent out to reviewers and radio stations..Now and
then it
pops up for sale on E-bay. Just be careful about paying high prices for
this CD
- some are bootleg CD-R copies.
I have a CD-R copy of the promo. The only cavet is that the 4 demo tracks are
rough quality but are very interesting. "Tonight:" started out as a mock
country number called "Oh Tonight" that is drastically different than the
released classic version. Sad this CD never hit the retail shelves, same for
domestic reissues of the 4 original albums.
Billy
At 03:56 PM 9/5/03 -0600, you wrote:
>> From: bob_hutton@standardlife.com
>> To: audities@smoe.org
>> Subject: New Raspberries comp.
>> Message-ID:
>> <OF62692E2D.85E99619-ON80256D98.00508645@internal.standardlife.com>
>>
>> I just got all excited there cos I found out that Capitol were releasing a
>> new remastered Raspberries "Best Of" - I thought it might be the one with
>> the bonus unreleased stuff that got shelved a couple of years ago. Alas
>> no, its a 12 (twelve!) track comp. Talk about insulting your customers. I
>> mean, the only people who are going to even think about buying Raspberries
>> stuff would be die-hard fans, and I don't think a 12 track comp is going to
>> elicit much support from them!
>> B^(
>>
>
>
>Well, it keeps the music alive and in print...but knowing the issues of the
>one that Capitol wanted to release three years ago fairly well, blame Eric
>Carmen, not Capitol...or the battling Bryson/Carmen feud, as well.
>
>The bonus material is the problem w/ that earlier attempt at a great comp.
>They fought about money issues related to the trax and changed their mind
>about wanting them on the CD---after EMI pressed them. There's many
>thousands sitting, sadly, in a warehouse. They may hav been destroyed by
>now, even.
>
>Many times, we can't blame the labels for obvious deletions or supposed
>oversights...there are many issues that can result in such a comp as this
>new one, coming out the way it did.
>
>Still, that said...i'ms ure they could have gone 15 trax, not 12.
>
>Bruce
>@ Not Lame
>
Billy G. Spradlin
http://listen.to/jangleradio
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.