smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: the Sweetshop |
| Date | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 22:44:01 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain (1.4 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Ryan is correct, in that the band was The Sweet. I'm not sure when they
dropped 'The' from their name, but by the release of their SWEET FANNY ADAMS
lp, they were just Sweet.
Mike Bennett
NP -- The Wilbur Wood Chorus -- WHY WON'T THEY FIRE JERRY MANUEL?
Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com
>From: "Ryan Hoekstra" <erhoek@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: <audities@smoe.org>
>Subject: the Sweetshop
>Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:28:19 -0400
>
>
>I believe the Sweet kept the in their name which was left over from their
>"Listen to the Flower People " (Spinal Tap reference) era as the Sweetshop.
>-r
>
>np...Optigonally Yours-Presents Exclusively Talentmaker
>
>
>A band that I could never figure out whether to add the
>"The" to was/is (The) Sweet. I tend to think just Sweet
>works better but have seen it in print and heard it spoken
>both ways many times.
>
>Perhaps it was a situation where they were The Sweet while
>under the tutelage of the two producers but when they got
>out from under them and started writing and performing more
>of their own material they became just Sweet? Mike B., any
>insight?
>
>dm
>
>np: The Oranges Band- All Around
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0!
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.