Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003084, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From CCDatsMe@aol.com
Subject Big Star
Date Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:36:20 EDT

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (2.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

While the argument against Big Star as a major power pop influence seems 
well-reasoned, I can't support it at all.  By 1978, when the phrase "power pop" 
was entering the general lexicon, Big Star was already being hailed as an 
influence.  Bomp! magazine's essential power pop issue in '78 gave a great deal of 
ink to the Big Star story for that very reason.  The Flashcubes were doing 
"September Gurls" in their live set, and I doubt they were the only avowed power 
pop act mining the Big Star canon at the time.  
       Mike Bennett (I think--Mike wrote the original post, if I remember 
correctly) lists The Scruffs as an act not overtly influenced by Big Star, and 
that's demonstrably NOT true.  Not only do I hear Big Star in most of the Wanna' 
Meet The Scruffs? album, the group had earelier cut a (then-) unreleased 
track called "Big Star," and if you hear it, you can tell the title was not chosen 
lightly.
       (And yeah, I've seized upon the one overtly-Big Star-smitten band in 
Mike's list of '70s power pop acts he claims have no huge Big Star influence.  
Can't really argue with the rest of the list.  As I said, the argument seems 
reasonable, but it doesn't jibe with my memories of the era, when I knew Big 
Star was of enormous importance even before I ever heard any of the group's 
recordings.  When I first heard the recording of "September Gurls," I was 
disappointeed because I thought The Flashcubes did it better; it ultimately became one 
of my ever-changing nominees for The Greatest Record Ever Made.)
       I'll further concede that the importance of Big Star as an influence 
pales beside that of, say, The Beatles or the early Who--especially when Big 
Star's influence is measured by its effect on music geeks like me who were 
reading Bomp! magazine in '78--but I insist they were of an importance equal to The 
Raspberries, even though The Raspberries sold more records.  I loved (and 
still love) The Raspberries, but they were actively DESPISED by many in their 
day; the level of respect the rock audience had for The Raspberries in the 
mid-'70s is roughly akin to the respect that audience now has for Smash Mouth, or 
even Justin Timberlake.  Sure, The Raspberries deserved a better fate...but they 
didn't achieve it.
       Big Star, by contrast, was unknown to most folks, but also had none of 
the perceived baggage of The Raspberries.  Big Star could be discovered.  Big 
Star could be a cult band.  Big Star could be COOL!  It then gets back to The 
Velvet Underground template:  Big Star sold few records, but the few who 
bought 'em all formed bands.  
       (And The Flashcubes also covered The Raspberries, of course.)
CC!  
THIS IS ROCK 'N' ROLL RADIO
Sunday nights from 9 to midnight Eastern USA time (with repeats all day 
Wednesday), on the web at wxxe.org <A HREF="http://www.wxxe.org/">Syracuse Community Radio</A>  

Message Index for 2003084, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help