Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003084, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "josh chasin" <jchasin@nyc.rr.com>
Subject Re: Big Star and Rosetta Stones
Date Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:25:42 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (4.6 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

I'm not sure I agree regarding Big Star's influence.  You are right that
their blip on the radar screen was meager during their active career.  But
like the Velvet Underground, they are a band where everyone who heard them
started a band.  You mention some of the obvious descendents of Big Star:
TFC, Posies, Replacements, dBs.  I'd add Mitch Easter and bands he's worked
with (I hear Big Star in Mayflies USA); the Bangles; Matthew Sweet;
Lemonheads; and others.  At this point I think the influence of Big Star--
through second and third generation adherents-- is indelibly etched into the
genre I won't name.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
To: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:18 PM
Subject: Big Star and Rosetta Stones


> In one of his typically erudite posts, Greg Sager referred to "September
> Gurls" as "the Rosetta Stone" of power pop.  I want to avoid any
discussion
> of the definition of power pop, as it's as pointless as reasoning with
Judge
> Roy Moore.  But, I wanted to discuss Big Star and where they stand in
power
> pop.
>
> While, if I'm explaining to some hipster the parameters of power pop, I'll
> name Big Star as a power pop artist, I've never thought of them as truly
> being a power pop band.  Of course, that has more to do with my subjective
> definition of the genre.  Objectively, however, I think that Big Star's
> place in power pop history has been vastly overrated.
>
> I don't think it is possible for Big Star to have recorded any "Rosetta
> Stone", due to the simple fact that Big Star's influence on the
development
> of the power pop genre is negligible.  Big Star were contemporaries of
> Badfinger and The Raspberries, and sold about 5 or 10 percent of what they
> sold.  They were a cult band, and that cult was very small through most of
> the '70s.  As the '70s went on, and more bands played power pop.  And none
> of them really displayed any Big Star influence -- whether it's Dwight
> Twilley Band, The Scruffs, The Shoes, Cheap Trick, The Knack, 20/20,
> Pezband, and a host of skinny tie bands, you can't really find any Big
Star
> in their music, except to the extent that any of those bands shared
similar
> influences.
>
> It really wasn't until some Southern bands came up that you really began
to
> see more Big Star influence -- in particular, The dBs, though artists like
> R.E.M. and The Windbreakers also showed some of that influence too.
Still,
> you had folks like Marshall Crenshaw and other who were immune from any
Big
> Star mojo.  The only other artists I could really link to the band from
that
> era would be Tommy Keene, who covered a Chilton solo tune, and Game
Theory.
>
> Indeed, the Stamey-era dB's and Game Theory had the most overt Big Star
> influence.  And notably, both Chris Stamey and Scott Miller seemed really
> taken by RADIO CITY and the quirkier side of that brilliant album.
>
> The next wave of bands to really solidify a consistent Big Star influence
> were The Replacements (though, IMO, very superficially), The Posies and
> Teenage Fanclub.  And, notably, all three bands really emphasized the
least
> challenging elements of Big Star music.  No knock on "Thirteen" and
> "September Gurls", but they aren't really groundbreaking songs, as opposed
> to let's say "Good Vibrations" or "Go All The Way", they are simply great
> (and, really, perfect) songs.
>
> There is nothing wrong with Big Star's accessible material becoming so
> influential, but the inspiration of Big Star on rock music, and
specifically
> power pop, if often pretty reductive.  Like The Beatles, Led Zeppelin and
> The Velvet Underground, using just three examples, there is no signature
Big
> Star sound.  Each album is a unique entity and many of the more difficult
> elements of their music have not found their way into the vocabulary of
many
> of the bands who most like to fly the Big Star flag high.
>
> However, in any discussion of the impact of their music, it must be noted
> that they are an influence that got absorbed into power pop after it went
> through its first one or two phases, and really only got absorbed as part
of
> the foundation of the music about a decade after power pop got going as
> genre.
>
> This is akin to the way that The Sonics became an extremely influential
band
> in garage rock many years after their hey day.
>
> That's all --
>
> Mike Bennett
>
> NP:  Pansy Division -- TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT!
>
>
>
> Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>


Message Index for 2003084, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help