smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | "Mark Tate" <zumpp99@hotmail.com> |
Subject | Re: Neil Young-Harvest & Greendale |
Date | Mon, 25 Aug 2003 06:36:41 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Neil Young's Pet Sounds? Really!
>From: "Barry R. Schlom" <barrys@lernerweisslaw.com>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: "'audities@smoe.org'" <audities@smoe.org>
>Subject: Re: Neil Young-Harvest & Greendale
>Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 09:16:43 -0700
>
>It is Neil's Pet Sounds. It is almost uniformly brilliant --- with the
>patent exception of the execrable Last Trip To Tulsa.
>
>--- Barry Schlom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bryan [mailto:munki100@pacbell.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 9:55 AM
> > To: audities@smoe.org
> > Subject: Re: Neil Young-Harvest & Greendale
> >
> >
> > Mark Tate wrote about Neil Young's first album:
> > > is pretty mediocre, though it has moments.
> >
> > Mediocre? Hmm, I disagree. It's one of my favorite
> > albums -- "The Loner," "If I Could Have Her Tonight,"
> > "I've Been Waiting For You," "The Old Laughing
> > Lady," "Here We Are In The Years," "What Did You
> > Do To My Life," "I've Loved Her So Long,".....those
> > are all beautiful songs (IMO). Anyone else love this
> > (sadly underrated) album?
> >
> > Bryan
> >
_________________________________________________________________
Get MSN 8 and enjoy automatic e-mail virus protection.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.