smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | kcronin <fiatluxury@yahoo.com> |
| Subject | seminal music |
| Date | Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT) |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.6 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
--- Christobal <plattc@optonline.net> wrote:
> This is in line with a concept I've been thinking a
> lot lately, that
> musical tastes are very much formed early on, based
> on exposure, but
> that as those tastes mature and evolve, they
> simultaneously both broaden
> and narrow (at least for the avid music-listener).
I was only just thinking about something my comrade
Ellen, my music-discovering buddy in high school,
related to me years ago: she remembers distinctly
being 17 or so and standing in a record store with
money for only one LP - the two she had in her hands
were 10,000 Maniacs "In My Tribe" and Television's
"Marquee Moon" (because she liked the covers) and she
ended up with 10,000 Maniacs, a choice that informed
many of our musical choices for the next couple of
years. Which makes me wonder: at that divergent
moment, could we have created a tendency to like
harder-edged, ultimately more 'indie' releases than we
ended up liking for many years thereafter? might i
have more handily impressed the music-loving boys in
my dorm years later with my knowledge of proto-punk
instead of my knowledge of folk-rock and todd
rundgren, or, at that point, did all roads just lead
everybody to Husker Du? An interesting query, though
probably not a very profitable one.
just noodlin,
--kelly
np: alkaline trio - damn, i love a rock crooner. "all
on black" is one of the flat-out coolest songs i've
heard this year.
=====
oderint dum mentuant
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.