smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Andrea Kremer <kremer@shore.net> |
| Subject | Re: Liz Phair |
| Date | Tue, 20 May 2003 15:54:26 -0400 (EDT) |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.6 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I'm not sure that tracks were actually recorded... if they were, I wonder
if there are bootlegs lying about...
Slavering,
Andrea
(who has an advance of the Liz cd, and agrees: it's Avril-like.)
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Christobal wrote:
> I understand that Michael Penn originally produced a number of tracks
> for this album, which were subsequently scrapped in favor of something
> presumably a little more radio-friendly. Not that Michael Penn isn't
> radio-friendly to my ears, but then, I personally can't stomach
> commercial radio these days for more than 5 minutes at a time. Or less.
>
> Would've been interesting to hear what he did with Liz.
>
> Christopher
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: audities-owner@smoe.org
> > [mailto:audities-owner@smoe.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Mason
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 3:41 PM
> > To: audities@smoe.org; audities@smoe.org
> > Subject: Re: Liz Phair
> >
> >
> > At 12:29 PM 5/20/2003 -0700, shawn campbell wrote:
> > >I'm sure the intent here was to get ol' Liz on the
> > >radio, to "bring her work to more people." Well, it
> > >MAY get her on the radio on your local "modern adult
> > contempory" radio
> > >station, but it won't bring any of her PAST work to a wider
> > audience,
> > >because this is not the same artist who made the first three albums.
> >
> > I haven't heard the record yet, but the fact that "this is
> > not the same artist" is supposed to be the point: she's not a
> > stoned 21-year-old smartass anymore. Personally, I think
> > trying to make EXILE II would be a far more shameful affair.
> >
> > S
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.