Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003053, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Stewart Mason <flamingo@theworld.com>
Subject Re: Lindsey Buckingham/Go Insane
Date Wed, 21 May 2003 17:34:31 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

At 05:27 PM 5/21/2003 -0400, WARFELT@Nationwide.com wrote:
>After two listens,  I can say that the title Go Insane is very appropriate.
>It sounded like he was going insane.   It sounds like a mish mash of song
>ideas that were not fully realized, that were way over produced in the
>studio.  What was he thinking.   Was this some type of vanity project or
>something self indulgent?  What is his other solo material like?

Pretty much like this.  Even a lot of his Fleetwood Mac material is on the
weird side -- nothing on any of his solo albums is as flat-out strange as
"Tusk" or the live version of "Not That Funny" -- and his solo records let
his devotion to Brian Wilson's '67-'73 period run rampant.
>
>My first exposure to the Lindsey Buckingham was with the 45 of Kind of a
>Drag  by the Buckingham Nicks from the 60's when I was a very young child.

That's the Buckinghams.  Who have nothing to do with Lindsey.

S





Message Index for 2003053, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help