Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003044, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Dixie Chicks on EW
Date Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:53:08 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

No -- I don't think Greg meant that.  It's OK for to be an elitist too...

Dwight D. Wisenheimer



Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com





>From: Stewart Mason <flamingo@theworld.com>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: audities@smoe.org, audities@smoe.org
>Subject: Re: Dixie Chicks on EW
>Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:34:30 -0400
>
>At 03:27 PM 4/25/2003 -0500, Sager, Greg wrote:
> >> > >         In *Entertainment Weekly*? I wouldn't hold my breath, 
>unless
> >> you
> >> > >have a pretty broad definition of "reasonable facsimile".
> >> >
> >> > Who's "elitist" now? It's an information medium like any other.
> >> >
> >> 	An information medium that has not exactly established a track
> >> record for establishing a highbrow cultural dialectic. If my pointing 
>that
> >> out is elitist, then so be it.
>
>Yeah, it is.  So it's okay for you to be elitist, but not anybody else.
>Gotcha.
>
>S
>
>
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


Message Index for 2003044, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help