smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Eytan Mirsky" <eytanmirsky@hotmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Dixie chicks on EW |
| Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:04:10 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain (1.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Will wrote:
I'm pretty sure most of that blame should go to Entertainment Weekly. I
really can't believe that the Dixie Chicks showed up at the magazine's
offices and said, "Hey, we've got this great idea for the cover photo..."
I reply:
You're right, but as they used to say, if they had an idea to take a picture
of them jumping off the Brooklyn Bridge, would they do that, too?
I mean, going back already to the Janet Jackson Rolling Stone cover (and all
its imitations) all the way to Christina Aguilera also on the cover of
Rolling Stone, hasn't the getting naked bit been overdone already? And it's
always with some lame come-on, like "So and so bares it all, about her
career, her life, etc." This time with the Dixie Chicks it's they "come
clean." Hey, they should have taken some photos in the shower, soaping each
others' backs.
The silliest thing in the Dixie Chicks' pix is the part where one of the
sisters seems to be holding the others' breast.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.