Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "ira rosen" <irosen@ixtelecom.com>
Subject Re: Morality and mp3s
Date Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:09:16 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (2.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


----- Original Message -----
From: "*Bill Holmes*" <bholmes_fm@msn.com>
To: "ira rosen" <irosen@ixtelecom.com>; <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: Morality and mp3s


> > I submit that if it has been acceptable to record Casey Kasem's Top 40,
> then
> > recording "trials" off of a streaming source on the Internet would be
> > equally acceptable (or unacceptable), as rule now dictates their
equation
> > with radio and requires royalty payments (obscenely high and unfair).
>
> I think what turned the tide on taping was the speed and expense factors.
> Buying tapes even at 1.99 per, copying and mailing to friends took time
> (copying at what - 2x?) and money (ask any early SOTT participant). The
fact
> that thousands of people can instantaneously copy and distribute music at
> (arguably) equal quality and at almost no cost (email vs snail mail) means
> even a lazy person can accumulate a music library without spending money.

Speed/expense does not change the relative morality of the situation -
either both are moral, or both are not.

> > *Unauthorized* mp3 downloading is immoral - help me find a way around
it.
>
> I can't - my stance has always been that taking an artists' work without
> their (or their legal representative's) permission is theft.

Agreed - my point with the request was to see if anyone was up to the
challenge thrown down.

But I choke on the logic of used CD purchases. :)

It's my understanding that the purchase of a CD entitles one to the
ownership of that unit - the sale of that unit to someone else would be
permitted.  If this is not the case, then the fee for purchase is merely a
rental fee - I don't believe that that's the structure.  With movies, you
can rent or buy - with music, no rental entities exist, but borrowing is
perfectly accptable - copying for the purposes of not purchasing a copy is
immoral for either movies or music.
>
> cheers
> b, still catching up
>
>


Message Index for 2003024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help