smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | MBaroneO@aol.com |
| Subject | Re: Was: Re: Mayer, but has deteriorated to this |
| Date | Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:09:12 EST |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.5 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
In a message dated 2/27/03 6:51:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
JBrenneman@macdermid.com writes:
<<
MB: (taken out of context to emphasize MY point, hey journalists do it, why
can't I?)
>"Yeah but unfortunately *most* amazing looking teenage and college women
have
>shitty/retarded taste in music and music is certainly not any passionate
>thing for them."
I beg to differ! I've met some very attractive college women with
impeccable tastes in music (which means, uh hem, taste equal to mine.) <--
Need I mention the sarcasm here?! I'm GUESSING that a few of our females
here in this forum are 'easy on the eyes'. Hey, take Anna for example!
Yeah, I've been to the I.P.O shows. >>
Sorry. Didn't mean to come off so opinionated. The fact is (in *my*
experience) that unless you have the opportunity to expose an attractive
college woman to great music
(which means, uh hem, taste equal to mine too. LOL!) most of them just
aren't interested or have any aptitude or passion for it. My statement
wasn't a diss on any of the attractive female Auditeers. I mean just LOOK at
what is considered "college alternative" these days.
Ferchrissakes....college alternative used to consist of people like The
Replacements, Rem, Robyn Hitchcock, The Church etc. Now there were plenty of
attractive college women into those bands. I guess maybe what I am saying is
that the genre has detoriated so much (translate: not to my liking).
MB
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.