Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "josh chasin" <jchasin@nyc.rr.com>
Subject Re: gramit, janet!
Date Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:17:09 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


----- Original Message -----
From: Andrea Kremer <kremer@shore.net>
\> > yeah, but so what's your point?  (To turn the tables, am I the only
person
> > who, upon hearing (insert Audities band here), thinks: "Badfinger
> > did that years ago, and before them, The Beatles?)   Based on the bands
I've
> > seen touted on this list, many of whom I like or love, I don't think
most of
> > us judge the bands based on how groundbreaking they are -- it's more
like,
> > is it good music or not?
>
> I guess my point would be: No, I don't think it was good enough music to
> deserve Anything of the Year awards.

I responded to Andrea's original post by saying that every time I hear
Norah, I think to myself, "I really should go and pull out my old Rikki Lee
Jones records."

My point was, I never did get around to buying the Norah cd.  But I did
enjoy re-discovering Rikki's catalog (and I even bought two "official
bootlegs" from her website.)  So FWIW, you can probably directly attribute 2
Rikki Lee units shifted to my exposure to Norah, but I still don't own the
Norah record.

Of course, I don't need to.  I can't swing a dead cat without hitting
someone who wants to play it for me.











Message Index for 2003024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help