Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003022, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Shawn Huckaby <tikiking@att.net>
Subject Re: Another dogpile
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:50:40 -0700

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (3.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Eb wrote:

> 
> Well, I've been inching toward the exit door for weeks, and planned to 
> leave once the Pazz & Jop was sorted out. But I dunno...since 
> peripherally saying so in public, I've received some unexpected emails 
> from less histrionic subscribers (lurkers, naturally) which tempt me to 
> stay. So, now I'm feeling torn again. Maybe the list needs some yang to 
> balance all the cheerleaders' yin, and the other yangers are too 
> resigned to bother speaking up. We'll see. 

Allow me (as a borderline yanger as defined above) to delurk for a brief 
and infrequent moment to say that I have noticed a lot of the same 
issues on this list over the last few years I've been subscriber (though 
admittedly not to the degree that EB has).  Perception is reality to at 
least a few of us on the periphery, and that perception is of a small 
core of frequent posters with markedly similar (and seemingly narrow) 
tastes that drive most of the discussions and determine the 
"group-think" of what constitutes good music in this forum.

I tend to have fairly diverse tastes, and from a set theory point of 
view I suppose I only have about a 20% overlap with much of what is 
discussed here. It's not that I don't appreciate the styles represented 
here so much as I find many of the releases mentioned either 
by-the-numbers attempts to recreate earlier better albums, or overly 
broad nostalgic homages to another time.  I guess I demand a little 
something more from the music that truly moves me; I would like it if 
the artist had something new to say, or at least a new or impassioned 
way to say it.

Don't get me wrong, I have found many artists through this list I would 
have otherwise missed, and who I now follow closesly; The Sugarplastic, 
Splitsville, Willie Wisely, the Aluminum Group, and Cockeyed Ghost to 
name but a few.  Over the years I have learned who I am likely to agree 
with musically, and who to avoid like the plague (as on any list).

The thing that troubles me though, is that whenever someone steps up and 
challenges the popularity or quality of any of the commonly heralded 
Audities artists, they are frequently set upon by numerous individuals, 
and challenged as to their standing/credentials and why they should even 
be allowed to broach the subject!  Then when tempers inevitably flair on 
both sides of the argument only the outsider is called to task for being 
argumentative, rude, childish, etc.  Look at this last situation as a 
perfect example.  EB was attacked on all sides (often personally) about 
his lapses in courtesy and even about his ability to truly discern 
"good" music.  Most appallingly, it was even insinuated that if he 
wasn't willing to renounce his past sins and take up the path of 
enlightenment he should leave---and the sooner the better!  Amazingly, 
the list regulars who were exhibiting the same behavior that EB was 
accused of were never taken to task for their roles in the altercation 
(I could name names, but the posts are there for everyone to see, and I 
think you know who you are).

This is just the type of behavior that keeps us lurkers doing just that. 
  I will continue to subscribe for the occasional recommendation that 
lives up to the hype, but I doubt I'll post much....it's just not worth 
the drama for something that ultimately is a matter of personal taste. 
It does sadden me though that this level of high-school "love it or 
leave it" bullshit has to get in the way of a legitimate discussion of 
music.

For the record:

-I hope EB stays on and keeps everybody on point.  After all, (to 
loosely paraphrase) an unexamined belief is one not worth having.

-I thought Cornelius's Point was infinitely better and more focused than 
Fantasma.

-The last barrage of Top 5 marital aids/college mascots lists was 
insufferable--even with the ability to delete individual posts.

Feel free to pile on boys and girls.  After all, I'm not one of the 
regulars.

Shawn Huckaby



Message Index for 2003022, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help