Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003021, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From bob_hutton@standardlife.com
Subject Re: Popular Bands that suck
Date Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:20:13 +0100

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

In reply to Gary's query about bands that need to be knocked off their
perch ....

>Since we're limiting the question to the CURRENT scene (and therefore
>excluding The Beatles, Jellyfish, etc.), let me nominate a few current
>artists and see if anybody will dare to knock them out of the
>"universally loved" category.  In NO particular order:
>
>Matthew Sweet
Good songwriter, but I find his voice bland and whiney over a whole album's
worth.

>Squeeze
Great singles band, but their albums are way overrated.

>XTC
Again, never could see what all the fuss was about....apart from the
singles compilation, I don't feel any great need to have any of their other
stuff.

>Myracle Brah
I dug the first 3 albums, but does anyone else out there think that Bleeder
is a bit of a turkey in comparison?

>Teenage Fanclub
Schizo band: The Blake/Love songs are great.  The McGinley songs are not.
And he cannot sing either.  A good argument against democratic song sharing
in a band.

>The Vandalias
>The Shazam
Two of my faves, they deserve their place on their perch!





Message Index for 2003021, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help